ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTIES (SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY) OF CYFRA 21-1 IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Authors

  • Gulmeena Masood Department of Oral Pathology, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Sofia Haider Durrani Department of Oral Pathology, Sardar Begum Dental College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Syed Amjad Abbas Department of Oral Pathology, Bashir College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Iqra Muhammad Khan Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Ambreen Department of Oral Pathology, KMU-IDS Kohat, Pakistan.
  • Sana Salam Department of Oral Pathology, Sardar Begum Dental College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Bisma Fayyaz Department of Public Health, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v16i01.977

Keywords:

CYFRA 21-1, Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Sensitivity, Specificity

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity and specifi city of the salivary CYFRA 21-1, to be applied in a defined clinical context.

Materials and Methods: A case-control design was employed, conducted in Sardar Begum Dental College, and the data was collected from Khyber College of Dentistry, with a total of 101 diagnosed but untreated individuals of Oral squamous cell carcinoma (cases) with biopsy reports and 101 controls, non-disease (matched for age and gender) were selected for the research. Saliva samples were taken from both groups and followed by, testing CYFRA 21-1 using a commercially available ELISA kit to determine its concentration and its sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The findings demonstrated that CYFRA 21-1 exhibits strong diagnostic performance for Oral squamous cell carcinoma, with a sensitivity of 93.6%, Specifi city of 93%, a positive predictive value of 92.5%, and a negative predictive value of 93.75%.

Conclusion: The results highlight the validity of CYFRA 21-1, as a promising biomarker of the saliva for the very initial identification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

References

Gupta N, Gupta R, Acharya AK, Patthi B, Goud V, Reddy S, et al. Changing trends in oral cancer—a global scenario. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016;6(4):613–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i4.17255

Carreras-Torras C, Gay-Escoda C. Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(3):e305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20347

Browne RM, Camsey MC, Waterhouse JA, Manning GL. Etiological factors in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1977;5(6):301–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1977.tb01018.x

Cirillo N. Precursor lesions, overdiagnosis, and oral cancer: a critical review. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(8):1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081550

Swift SL, Duff y S, Lang SH. Impact of tumor heterogeneity and tissue sampling for genetic mutation testing: a systematic review and post hoc analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;126:45–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.010

Mino-Kenudson M. Cons: Can liquid biopsy replace tissue biopsy?—the US experience. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5(4):424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2016.08.01

Kumari S, Samara M, Ampadi Ramachandran R, Gosh S, George H, Wang R, et al. A review on saliva-based health diagnostics: biomarker selection and future directions. Biomed Mater Devices. 2024;2(1):121–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-023-00090-z

Gaba FI, Sheth CC, Veses V. Salivary biomarkers and their efficacies as diagnostic tools for oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2021;50(3):299–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12791

Shaw AK, Garcha V, Shetty V, Vinay V, Bhor K, Ambildhok K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary biomarkers in detecting early oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(5):1483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1483

Cai K, Pi W, Qin J, Peng C, Wang D, Gu Y, et al. Detection of CYFRA 21-1 in human serum by an electrochemical immunosensor based on UiO-66-NH2@CMWCNTs and CS@AuNPs. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2023;230:113517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113517

Kumar P, Singh K, Garg A, Urs AB, Augustine J. Salivary IL-8, CYFRA 21-1, and CD44 for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2025;120471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2025.120471

Muraki M, Tohda Y, Iwanaga T, Uejima H, Nagasaka Y, Nakajima S. Assessment of serum CYFRA 21-1 in lung cancer. Cancer. 1996;77(7): 1274–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1274::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-I

Yamamoto K, Oka M, Hayashi H, Tangoku A, Gondo T, Suzuki T. CYFRA 21-1 is a useful marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;79(9):1647–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970501)79:9<1647::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-9

Rastel D, Ramaioli A, Cornillie F, Thirion B; CYFRA 21-1 Multicentre Study Group. CYFRA 21-1, a sensitive and specific new tumour marker for squamous cell lung cancer. Report of the fi rst European multicentre evaluation. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30(5):601–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(94)90528-2

AlAli AM, Walsh T, Maranzano M. CYFRA 21-1 and MMP-9 as salivary biomarkers for the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(8):973–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.01.020

Simon R. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(8):djv153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv153

Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan RS, Najeeb S, Slowey PD, Rehman IU. Role of salivary biomarkers in oral cancer detection. Adv Clin Chem. 2018;86:23–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2018.05.002

Malhotra R, Urs AB, Chakravarti A, Kumar S, Gupta VK, Mahajan B. Correlation of Cyfra 21-1 levels in saliva and serum with CK19 mRNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(7):9263–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4809-4

Wieskopf B, Demangeat C, Purohit A, Stenger R, Gries P, Kreisman H, et al. Cyfra 21-1 as a biologic marker of non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic role. Chest. 1995;108(1):163–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.108.1.163

Zhong LP, Zhang CP, Zheng JW, Li J, Chen WT, Zhang ZY. Increased Cyfra 21-1 concentration in saliva from primary oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52(11):1079–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.05.005

Chen Z, Liu X, Shang X, Qi K, Zhang S. The diagnostic value of the combination of carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen, CYFRA 21-1, neuron-specific enolase, tissue polypeptide antigen, and progastrin-releasing peptide in small cell lung cancer discrimination. Int J Biol Markers. 2021;36(4):36–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17246008211049446

Liang Y, Yi Z, Li J, Ye J. The diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2024;24(11):1161–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2405225

Liu L, Xie W, Xue P, Wei Z, Liang X, Chen N. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic applications of CYFRA 21-1 in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216561

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Masood, G. ., Durrani, S. H. ., Abbas, S. A. ., Khan, I. M. ., Ambreen, Salam, S. ., & Fayyaz, B. . (2026). ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTIES (SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY) OF CYFRA 21-1 IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA. JOURNAL OF KHYBER COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, 16(01), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v16i01.977