ANALYSIS OF MEAN ANTERIOR ALVEOLAR BONE THICKNESS AMONG THE PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH MALALIGNED TEETH AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Marina Memon Department of Orthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Hasnain Sakrani Department of Orthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Ambreen Afzal Ehsan Department of Orthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Muzamil Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v15i04.963

Keywords:

Malaligned teeth, Alveolar bone thickness, Malocclusion, Cephalometric analysis, Lateral cephalogram, Dental malocclusion, Orthodontic

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the mean anterior alveolar bone thickness among patients presenting with malaligned teeth.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the “Department of Orthodontics, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine”, Karachi, Pakistan from 1st Dec 2024 to 31st May 2025. A total of 100 patients with malaligned teeth, full permanent dentition, and clear lateral cephalograms were included. Malocclusion was classified using Angle’s criteria, and lateral cephalograms were hand-traced by a single examiner. Alveolar bone thickness was measured. Continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD, categorical variables as frequency and percentage. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, one-way ANOVA, and independent t-test were applied, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean age was 19.78 ± 6.20 years, with 53% females. Maxillary alveolar bone thickness averaged 10.02 ± 1.55 mm with no significant differences among malocclusion groups (p = 0.121). Mandibular thickness varied significantly (p = 0.003), highest in Class III (12.00 ± 3.32 mm). Maxillary labial bone was thinner in Class II (4.62 ± 1.41 mm) than Class I (5.58 ± 1.57 mm; p = 0.008), and mandibular lingual bone was thicker in Class III (5.75 ± 1.19 mm; p = 0.0005). No significant gender differences were observe.
Conclusion: Alveolar bone thickness varies with malocclusion type. Thinner maxillary labial bone in Class II and thicker mandibular bone in Class III emphasize the importance of individualized orthodontic planning to safeguard periodontal health.

References

Firincioglulari M, Koral S, Kurt D, Orhan K. Gender-Based Variation in Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisor Teeth: A CBCT Retrospective Study. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e944588-1. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944588

Vyas R, Khurana S, Khurana D, Singer SR, Creanga AG, Singer SR. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Evaluation of alveolar bone thickness and root angulation in anterior maxilla for planning immediate implant placement. Cureus. 2023 Apr 20;15(4): e37875. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37875

Andrews WA, Abdulrazzaq WS, Hunt JE, Mendes LM, Hallman LA. Incisor position and alveolar bone thickness. Angle Orthod. 2022;92(1):3-10. doi: 10.2319/022320-122.1

Matsumoto K, Sherrill-Mix S, Boucher N, Tanna N. A CBCT evaluation of alveolar bone dimensional changes and the periodontal limits of mandibular incisor advancement in skeletal Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90:330-38. doi: 10.2319/080219-510.1

Uesugi S, Imamura T, Kokai S, Ono T. CBCT-based diagnosis and treatment simulation for a patient with a protrusive profi le and a gummy smile. Korean J Orthod. 2018;48:189–99. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.189.

Pan Y, Chen S. Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):200–5. doi: 10.2319/042318-311.1

Hunga BQ, Hongb M, Kyungc HM, Kimb HJ. Alveolar bone thickness and height changes following incisor retraction treatment with microimplants: A cone beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthodontist. 2022;92(4):497-504. doi: 10.2319/091121-702.1.

Chen Y, Zhao B. Comparison and analysis of alveolar bone structure characteristics in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusion in the mandibular incisor region. Medicine. 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40184. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040184.

Lu CL, Li BW, Yang M, Wang XQ. Relationship between alveolar-bone morphology at the mandibular incisors and their inclination in adults with low-angle, skeletal class III malocclusion—A retrospective CBCT study. Plos one. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):e0264788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264788.

Liu H, Li S, Zhang W, Xu T. Three-dimensional morphological changes of the upper anterior alveolus after maxillary incisor retraction in Class II patients. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12903 023-02976-2

Aljabr AA, Almas K, Aljofi FE, Aljabr AA, Alzaben B, Alqanas S. A CBCT study of labial alveolar bone thickness in the maxillary anterior region in a teaching hospital population in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Biomedicines. 2023 May 29;11(6):1571. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061571.

Tang C, Han S, Wang S, Wei X, Zhang H. Evaluation of anterior teeth crown-root morphology and alveolar bone structure in patients with closed deep overbite using cone beam computed tomography. Scientifi c Reports. 2024 Oct 21;14(1):24670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75642-4

Yaseen TA, Younis H, Aghayants S, Yin M, Cheng B.. Impact of vertical facial pattern on anterior alveolar bone thickness and tooth morphology: A retrospective CBCT based clinical study.. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025;126(2):152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102128

Elangovan B, Srinivasan B, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S. Comparison of the collum angle of incisors and canines in skeletal malocclusions–A CBCT study.: a CBCT study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(3):468-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.006

Bhatnagar D, Khatria H. Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness Around the Incisors in Various Skeletal Patterns: A Cephalometric Study. Dent J Adv Stud 2023;11(3):116–23. DOI: 10.5005/djas-11014-0027

Wang M, Huang J, Tang X, et al. Anterior alveolar bone and tooth inclination in diff erent skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:1210. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025 06537-7

Dalaie K, Hajimiresmail YS, Safi Y, Baghban AA, Behnaz M, Rafsanjan KT. Correlation of alveolar bone thickness and central incisor inclination in skeletal Class I and II malocclusions with diff erent vertical skeletal patterns: A CBCT study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Oct 1;164(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.02.021

Rawaqa O, AlNimri KS, Abu Alhaija ES. Dentoalveolar characteristics in subjects with diff erent anteroposterior relationships: a retrospective cross-sectional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1579. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05322-2.

Zhang T, Zhang L, Li M, Yi F, Li C, Lu Y. Morphological changes in alveolar bone thickness and height after orthodontic proclination or labial movement combined with autogenous soft tissue grafting: a CBCT evaluation. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):218. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02944-w

Shafi zadeh M, Tehranchi A, Shirvani A, Motamedian SR. Alveolar bone thickness overlying healthy maxillary and mandibular teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inter Orthodo. 2021 Sep 1;19(3):389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.07.002.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Memon, M., Sakrani, H. ., Ehsan, A. A. ., & Muzamil, M. . (2025). ANALYSIS OF MEAN ANTERIOR ALVEOLAR BONE THICKNESS AMONG THE PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH MALALIGNED TEETH AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL. JOURNAL OF KHYBER COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, 15(04), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v15i04.963