CORRELATION BETWEEN FACIAL REFERENCES AND MESIODISTAL WIDTH OF MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH

Authors

  • Gohar Ali Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental Hospital Riphah International University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Hira Riaz Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental Hospital Riphah International University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Mohammad Aamir Ghafoor Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental Hospital Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Mohammad Hadee Aziz Resident Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental Hospital Riphah International University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Hafsa Ijaz Resident Department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental Hospital Riphah International University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Mohammad Abdul Wajid Department of Community Dentistry, Dental Section Frontier Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v15i04.898

Keywords:

Biometric Landmarks, Correlation, Facial Dimensions, Inter-Alar Width, Inter-Canthal Distance, Inter-Pupillary Distance

Abstract

Objectives: To find the relationship between facial measurements Inter Arch Width (IAW), Inter Canthal Distance (ICD), Inter Pupillary Distance (IPD) and the mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth.

Materials and Methods: The study employed non-probability purposive sampling on 100 patients, including both genders Measurements for ICD, IAW, IPD were taken using a digital vernier caliper and a wooden spatula. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed correlations between maxillary anterior teeth width and the measured parameters.

Results: The study involved 100 participants with a mean age of 29.95 years (SD ± 6.83), comprising 40% females and 60% males. Key facial and dental measurements included a mean inter-canthal width of 35.62 mm (SD ± 2.22), inter-pupillary distance of 61.44 mm (SD ± 4.35), inter-alar width of 40.62 ± 5.35 mm, and combined maxillary teeth width of 47.02 mm (SD ± 3.30). Signifi cant correlations were found between combined width of maxillary teeth (CWMT) and the facial measurements: ICD (r = 0.48), IPD (r = 0.42), and IAW (r = 0.61), all with p < 0.001. Strong correlations were found Between Combined Width Of Maxillary Teeth (CWMT) and ICD in females (r = 0.59) and moderate in males (r = 0.46), all statistically significant.

Conclusion: The findings showed significant correlations between CWMT and facial dimensions (ICD, IPD, IAW) across all genders with the strongest correlation between CWMT and IAW, indicating their potential as biometric landmarks for selecting upper anterior teeth .

References

Attokaran G, Shenoy K. Correlation between Innercanthal Distance and Mesiodistal Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in a Thrissur, Kerala, India, Population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(5):382-7.

Banerjee R, Chahande J, Radke U, Jaiswal P. Evaluation of the role of skull anthropometry for complete denture teeth selection: A cross-sectional study. J Ind Prosthod Soc. 2018;18(1):42-6.

Mishra MK, Singh RK, Suwal P, Parajuli PK, Shrestha P, Baral D. A comparative study to find out the relationship between the inner inter-canthal distance, interpupillary distance, inter-commissural width, inter-alar width, and the width of maxillary anterior teeth in Aryans and Mongoloids. Clin Cosmet Invest Dent. 2016;11:29-34.

Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, Do Prado Cj, Junior IL, De Lima Lucas B. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(4):196-205.

Parciak EC, Dahiya AT, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth width and facial dimensions of 3 ethnicities. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(4):504-10.

Neda A-K, Garib BT. Selecting maxillary anterior tooth width by measuring certain facial dimensions in the Kurdish population. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(3):329-34.

Brook AH, Jernvall J, Smith RN, Hughes TE, Townsend GC. The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Austr Dent J. 2014;59:131-42.

Shah SA, Naqash TA, Abdullah S, Bashir U, Gulzar S, Bashir S. Significance of Intercanthal Distance in the Selection of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Size in Kashmiri Population: A Research. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5(2):213-6.

Chaudhary MAG, Khan A, Qureshi A, Ahmad S. Relationship between intercanthal distance to inter canine width of maxillary anterior teeth in pakistani population. JPDA. 2018;27(03):124.

Deogade SC, Mantri SS, Sumathi K, Rajoriya S. The relationship between innercanthal dimension and interalar width to the intercanine width of maxillary anterior teeth in central Indian population. J Ind Prosthod Soc. 2015;15(2):91-7.

El-Sheikh N, Mendilawi L, Khalifa N. Intercanthal distance of a Sudanese population sample as a reference for selection of maxillary anterior teeth size. Sudan J Med Sci. 2010;5(2):55-9.

George S, Bhat V. Inner canthal distance and golden proportion as predictors of maxillary central incisor width in south Indian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(4):491-5.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Ali, G., Riaz, H. ., Ghafoor, M. A. ., Aziz, M. H. ., Ijaz, H. ., & Wajid, M. A. . (2025). CORRELATION BETWEEN FACIAL REFERENCES AND MESIODISTAL WIDTH OF MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH. JOURNAL OF KHYBER COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, 15(04), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v15i04.898