COMPARISON OF ANESTHETIC EFFICACY OF CONVENTIONAL INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK AND GOW GATES TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRAIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v9i02.857Keywords:
Irreversible pulpitis, inferior alveolar nerve block, Gow gates techniqueAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of the Gow-Gates techniques using 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in mandibular posterior teeth in patients presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Materials and Methods: A Randomized clinical trial was carried from January 2018 to December 2018 at Department of Operative Dentistry, Sardar Begum Dental College Peshawar. One hundred and six emergency patients with mandibular posterior teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis participated in the study and were randomly divided by lottery method into
two groups (fifty three in each group). Group A received inferior alveolar nerve block and group B received Gow-Gates injection to block the inferior alveolar nerve before endodontic access.Successful anesthesia of the technique was defined as no pain on interdental probing and lip numbness and no response to electric pulp tester (EPT).
Results: Subjective lip numbness was obtained 100% of the time with both the techniques and there was no pain on interdental probing in both the groups. Anesthesia was successful in 38 out of 53 subjects (72%) in inferior alveolar nerve block group while it was successful in 45 out of 53 subjects (85%) in Gow gates technique group. There was no statistically significant difference in the anesthetic efficacy of both techniques (p=0.099).
Conclusions: We concluded that in mandibular posterior teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block is similar to the Gow-Gates technique regarding anesthetic efficacy. There was no statistical significant difference in the anesthetic efficacy of both technique (p=0.099)
References
Giovannitti JA. Rosenberg MB. Phero JC. Pharmacology of Local Anesthetics Used in Oral Surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am.2013;25(3): 453–465.
Rao S, Rao V, Baratam N, Balla H, Kamalsha S, Eswara K. Hot tooth A challenge to endodontists. International Journal of Biomedical Research.2018;9(12):391-8.
Ghoddusi J, Zarrabi MH, Daneshvar F, Naghavi N. Efficacy of IANB and Gow-Gates Techniques in Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(2):143–148.
Bhuyan CA, Jain S, Kataki R, Latha SS. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline in patients with irreversible pulpitis: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(6):522-525.
Fehrenbach JM, Herring WS. Illustrated anatomy of the head and neck. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders;©2012.
Biočić J, Brajdić D, Perić B, Đanić P, Salarić I, MacanD. A Large Cheek Hematoma as a Complication of Local Anesthesia: Case Report. ActaStomatol Croat. 2018;52(2):156–159
Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D. Comparative evaluation of the anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, buccal-plus-lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2010;109:303–8.
Goldberg S, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of the Conventional inferior alveolar, Gow-Gates, and Vazirani-Akinosi techniques. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1306-11.
Khalil H. A basic review on the inferior alveolar nerve block techniques. Anesth Essays Res. 2014;8(1):3–8.
Potocnik I, Bajrovic F. Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(6):247-251.
Click V, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Evaluation of the Gow-Gates and Vazirani-Akinosi techniques in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A prospective randomized study. J Endod. 2015;41(1):16-21
Raj JD, Ramesh S. Evaluation of the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve blocks in dental patients - A systematic review. IOSR-JDMS. 2013;8(6):10-17.
Kafalias CM, Gow-Gates GAE. The Gow-Gates Technique for Mandibular Block Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1987;34:142-149.
Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 5th Ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2004.
Reader A, Nusstein J, Drum M. Successful Local Anesthesia. Quintessence Publishing Co, Hanover Park IL. 2011:135.
Clark K, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block. AnesthProg. 2002;49(2):49-55.
Hung PC, Chang HH, Yang PJ, Kuo YS, Lan WH, Lin CP. Comparison of the Gow-Gates Mandibula Block and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Using a Standardized Protocol. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105(2):139-46.
González JMM, Peña BB, FernándezCáliz F, HipólitoMarín LS, PeñarrochaDiago M. A comparative study of direct mandibular nerve block and the Akinosi technique. Med Oral. 2003;8(2):143-9
Ågren E, Danielsson K. Conduction block analgesia in the mandible. Swed Dent J. 1981;5:81-9.
Jung IY, Kim JH, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J endod. 2008;34:11–3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Rizwan Ullah Afridi, Shafqat Ali Shah, Inam Ullah Jan Khattak, Fawad Ali Shah, Muhammad Zain, Farhad Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.