COMPARISON OF 3-D AND STANDARD MINIPLATES FIXATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANGLE FRACTURE OF THE MANDIBLE

Authors

  • Uzair Pir Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Bacha Khan College of Dentistry / Mardan Medical Complex Mardan, Pakistan.
  • Hira Bashir Khattak Department of Physiology, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Sohail Health Department Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
  • Syed Ayaz Ali Shah Health Department Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
  • Ahmad Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Bacha Khan College of Dentistry / Mardan Medical Complex Mardan, Pakistan.
  • Raham Zaman Department Science of Dental Materials, Bacha Khan College of Dentistry Mardan, Pakistan.
  • Sertaj Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Bacha Khan College of Dentistry / Mardan Medical Complex Mardan, Pakistan.
  • Saifullah Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Bacha Khan College of Dentistry / Mardan Medical Complex Mardan, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v14i2.180

Keywords:

Mandibular fractures, 3-D plate, Post-operative pain, miniplate. Mandibular angle

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effi cacy of the 3-D and standard miniplates fi xation in the management
of angle fracture of the mandible.
Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from 20th December 2020 to 20th June 2021 at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mardan Medical Complex Mardan. A total 336 patients between the age of 18-60 years from both the genders reporting with mandibular fractures were selected for the study through non- probability consecutive sampling and were randomized in to 2 equal groups of 168 patients each through blind balloting. In group-A, fi xation was done using 3-D titanium plates while in Group-B 2 mm titanium miniplates were used. The primary outcome was set as the diff erence in mean operation time and mean pain post-operative pain score between the 2 groups at 2 weeks follow up.
Results: The age range was 18-60 years Mean±SD 31.178±7.86 years. Mean duration of fracture was 84.696±15.38 hour while weight was 65.059±11.97 Kg. Male and female were 78.6% and 21.4% respectively. The mean duration of operation was signifi cantly less with 3-D titanium plates compared to standard miniplate (15.791±1.49 min. Vs 17.690±1.28 min. respectively, p=0.00). The difference between the 2 groups regarding post-operative pain score was not statistically significant as assessed on VAS at 2 weeks follow up visit (1.571±0.49 vs 1.589±0.49 respectively, p-value=0.736).
Conclusion: 3-D plate provides the advantage over standard miniplate especially in terms of less operation time in the management of angle fracture at the mandible.

References

Lin FY, Wu CI, Cheng HT. Mandibular fracture patterns at a medical center in central Taiwan: a 3-year epidemiological review. Medicine. 2017;96(51):e9333.

Lee JH. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2017; 18(2):73-5.

Nogami S, Yamauchi K, Morishima H, Otake Y, Kouketsu A, Higuchi K et al. Mandible fractures and dental injuries related to road traffi c accidents over a 12-year period-retrospective multicentre study. Dent Traumatol. 2021 Apr;37(2):223-228.

Abotaleb BM, Al-Moraissi E, Zhiqiang W, Ping C, Yongjie K, Alkebsi K, et al. A detailed analysis of mandibular fractures epidemiology, treatment and outcomes: A 5-year retrospective study, Gansu Province- China. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2018;30 (2):197-205.

Dreizin D, Nam AJ, Tirada N, Levin MD, Stein DM, Bodanapally UK, et al. Multidetector CT of mandibular

fractures, reductions, and complications: a clinically relevant primer for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2016; 36(5):1539-64.

Patel N, Kim B, Zaid W. A detailed analysis of mandibular angle fractures: epidemiology, patterns, treatments, and outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74(9):1792-9.

Pickrell BB, Serebrakian AT, Maricevich RS. Mandible fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2017; 31 (3):100-7.

Al-Moraissi EA, Mounair RM, El-Sharkawy TM, El-Ghareeb TI. Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized,

double-blind, controlled clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;44(3):316-21.

de Oliveira JCS, Moura LB, de Menezes JDS, Gabrielli MAC, Pereira Filho VA, Hochuli-Vieira E. Three

dimensional strut plate for the treatment of mandibular fractures: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47(3):330-8.

Barde DH, Mudhol A, Ali FM, Madan RS, Kar S, Ustaad F. Effi cacy of 3-dimensional plates over Champys

miniplates in mandibular anterior fractures. J Int Oral

Health. 2014;6(1):20–6.

Gupte SH, Chaddva S, Jethwani Y, Mohandas A, Kumavat DP, Jhaveri N. Evaluation of effi cacy of three-dimensional stainless steel miniplates in the treatment of fractures of the mandible: a prospective study. J Orthop Case Rep. 2016;6(5):35-40.

El-Nakeeb NA, El-Dibany MA, Shokry MM. A comparative study between 3-d plates and conventional

miniplates for internal fi xation of anterior mandibular fractures. Alexandria Dent J 2016;41 (2):253-60.

Wusiman P, Taxifulati D, Weidong L, Moming A. Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. Sci 2019; 14 (1):66–80.

Bohner L, Beiglboeck F, Schwipper S, Lustosa RM, Segura CPM, Kleinheinz J et al. Treatment of Mandible

Fractures Using a Miniplate System: A Retrospective Analysis. J. Clin. Med 2020; 9 (4):2922.

Agarwal M, Meena B, Gupta DK, Tiwari AD, Jakhar SK. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3D and Standard Miniplates in Treatment of Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2014; 13 (1): 79-83.

Mittal Y, Varghese KG, Mohan S, Jayakumar N, Chhag S. A comparative study of 3-dimensional titanium versus 2-dimensional titanium miniplates for open reduction and fixation of mandibular parasymphysis fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Mar;15(1):93-8.

Singh R, Shahi AK, Prajapati VK, Sharma S, Chandra S, Kumar S. Comparative study of 3 dimensional and standard miniplate in management of anterior mandibular fractures. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2019;6(8):H5-H11.

Sarepally G, Seethamsetty S, Karpe T, Nasyam FA, Fatima U, Fatema R. A comparative evaluation of

0mm two-dimensional miniplates versus 2.0mm three-dimensional miniplates in mandibular fractures. Cureus. 2022 Jan 17;14(1):e21325.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Pir, U., Khattak, H. B., Muhammad Sohail, Shah, S. A. A., Khan, A. ., Zaman, R. ., Khan, S. ., & Saifullah. (2024). COMPARISON OF 3-D AND STANDARD MINIPLATES FIXATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANGLE FRACTURE OF THE MANDIBLE. JOURNAL OF KHYBER COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, 14(02), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v14i2.180

Most read articles by the same author(s)